نوع المستند : المقالة الأصلية
المؤلف
الاستاذ المساعد في المعهد العالي للعلوم و الثقافة الإسلامية، قم، ايران.
المستخلص
الكلمات الرئيسية
عنوان المقالة [English]
المؤلف [English]
The doctrine of Mahdism, as one of the fundamental pillars of Imamiya thought, has consistently faced challenges and pitfalls, among which "Tawqit" (setting a time for the Reappearance) is one of the most significant. frequently narrated hadiths, using expressions such as "The time-setters have lied" (Kadhaba al-Waqqatun), have categorically rejected this phenomenon. On the other hand, the "Principle of Bada" (alteration in the divine will), as one of the theological characteristics of Shi'ism, emphasizes the possibility of change in non-definitive divine decrees based on human voluntary actions. This research, employing a descriptive-analytical approach and relying on authoritative library sources including the Holy Quran, the narrations of the Infallibles (AS), and theological texts, examines the fundamental conflict between these two categories. The central question is: How does the principle of Bada render any claim of Tawqit inherently void? The research findings indicate that Tawqit necessitates the acceptance of an immutable historical determinism regarding the timing of the Reappearance, whereas the principle of Bada keeps the door open for the influence of human actions—such as supplication, repentance, and social reform—on hastening the advent of the Faraj (deliverance). These two perspectives—one based on temporal certainty and the other on the possibility of change through voluntary deeds—stand in clear and intrinsic conflict with one another. Accordingly, belief in the principle of Bada serves as a firm theological barrier against any claim of determining the time of the Reappearance and replaces passive, time-oriented waiting (for Imam Mahdi) with active and conscious waiting.
الكلمات الرئيسية [English]
)