نوع المستند : المقالة الأصلية
المؤلف
أستاذ مشارك، قسم أصول الإسلام النظرية، كلية الدراسات الإسلامية، جامعة الدراسات الإسلامية، قم، إيران
المستخلص
الكلمات الرئيسية
عنوان المقالة [English]
المؤلف [English]
the gross errors in the methodology of religious knowledge is exclusivism and monotony in a certain dimension of religious issues and religious knowledge in general. This error prevents the achievement of a comprehensive view and a systematic approach to religious issues, including Mahdism teachings. Mahdism and its related issues, due to its multi-lineage and multi-sided structure, require a deep and far-reaching look at its various dimensions and areas. Rigidity and prejudice towards a particular viewpoint without rational justification is a form of reductionism towards Mahdavi issues. In this study, through expressing and examining the approach of traditional Shariatists towards Mahdism teachings, methodological pathology is dealt with in the research field of this religious knowledge. The main finding of the study, in addition to stating the harms of this study of Mahdism, indicates the correct approach called the approach of civilizational rationality, which seems to be a comprehensive and complete view in the field of Mahdism studies. The analysis of this approach is done by descriptive-analytical method based on library documents.
Keywords
الكلمات الرئيسية [English]